Monday 20 June 2016

More On Ladbrokes' Refusal To Fully Pay Out On Seth Rollins

Preface: The situation I write about below has now been resolved. You can read more through this link

Earlier today, I published a post where I mentioned that Ladbrokes is refusing to pay me the full amount on Seth Rollins' win over Roman Reigns at last night's Money in the Bank show.

Since I put the post out there, I have had a lot of people get in touch. Some have told me that they're in the same boat as me, some have told me to go to IBAS to get this fixed up and one person has helped further by showing me his bet receipt from last night.

And guess what - Ladbrokes paid out on Seth Rollins at 8/1. His bet was struck later than mine.

Here's his bet:

Click on image to expand

In the image above, I have taken out the receipt number. I do have the original image, but thought it best not to have this information out there.

Now, check out the time the bet was placed: 20:31 BST, Compare this to the time mine was accepted:

Click on image to expand

Mine was struck at 20:24. Seven minutes before him for those of you who can't count (I'm looking at you Ladbrokes, and I'll get to that in a bit).

In this morning's chat with the Ladbrokes customer service rep, I was told that the pricing was inaccurate because Seth Rollins was meant to be 1/3 at that time. Of all the people he could have told that yarn to. I told him he was incorrect, but he would accept that Rollins was still an outsider six minutes later when I placed a bet on him over at Paddy Power. View the image below showing that I took Rollins at 7/2 at 20:30 BST.

Click on image to expand


On top of this, the Twitter user has other betting slips from the same time showing that William Hill (6/1), Betfair (9/2) and Sky Bet (5/1) all had Seth Rollins an underdog at that point in the evening.

Ladbrokes claimed that the odds for Seth Rollins at the time of my bet should have been 1/3. That's rubbish because - as highlighted above - he was an outsider across all of the European books at that point. The 1/3 argument also holds no water when a customer receives £10.67 in returns.

2 comments:

  1. you might want sportsbook review to investigate this for you they have gotten money for other people

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, but IBAS is the service over here that deals with these sorts of things.

      Delete

Thank you for reading this post. Please note: All comments are moderated and will be published or rejected at the blog owner’s discretion.

Summer 2020 Update:
Due to changes with the blogging platform (not getting notified of new comments), I have had to close the comment section. Until I find a remedy, you can reach out on Twitter (@WWELeaksDotOrg)

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.